Sunday, October 18, 2009

Michele Bachmann and Sarah Palin agree: "Good Intentions Aren't Enough with Health Care Reform"

Hi all:

Minnesota Congresswoman Michele Bachmann came to Connecticut yesterday to speak to the CT Liberty Forum. I had the privilege to both hear her speak and meet her, because she came and spent 20 minutes or so with Connecticut for Sarah, of which I'm one of the state organizers. We were glad to make her an honorary member of our group:

Photo courtesy Wayne Kilburn copyright 2009

(The woman to Bachmann's right is Daria Novak, who will defeat Congressman Joe Courtney in 2010. Yes, she will! But I digress ...)


Congresswoman Bachmann was informed and inspiring about the need for us to CALL OUR CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATIONS to stop this health care takeover. She compared it to the federal government's getting a federal "public option" for student loans 20 years ago.

It may have taken two decades, but last week President Obama nationalized all student loans - there are now no private student loans.

THAT IS WHAT WILL HAPPEN WITH OUR HEALTH CARE.

President Obama is on record saying that "it may take 10, 15, or 20 years but we will get a single payer option."

The Democrats are patient; they took 20 years to nationalize student financial aid.

They CANNOT BE ALLOWED TO GET THIS TROJAN HORSE OF A BILL PASSED, which allows anything close to a public option in health care.

If it passes, in 20 years or fewer, we will have completely NATIONALIZED HEALTH CARE, with no private options allowed.

On the same day that I was privileged to meet and be inspired by Congresswoman Bachmann to continue the fight, I got home and found that Sarah Palin had also written another call to action on health care:


Now that the Senate Finance Committee has approved its health care bill, it’s a good time to step back and take a look at the long term consequences should its provisions be enacted into law.


The bill prohibits insurance companies from refusing coverage to people with pre-existing conditions and from charging sick people higher premiums. [1] It attempts to offset the costs this will impose on insurance companies by requiring everyone to purchase coverage, which in theory would expand the pool of paying policy holders.


However, the maximum fine for those who refuse to purchase health insurance is $750. [2] Even factoring in government subsidies, the cost of purchasing a plan is much more than $750. The result: many people, especially the young and healthy, will simply not buy coverage, choosing to pay the fine instead. They’ll wait until they’re sick to buy health insurance, confident in the knowledge that insurance companies can’t deny them coverage. Such a scenario is a perfect storm for increasing the cost of health care and creating an unsustainable mandate program.


Those driving this plan no doubt have good intentions, but good intentions aren’t enough. There were good intentions behind the drive to increase home ownership for lower-income Americans, but forcing financial institutions to give loans to people who couldn’t afford them had terrible unintended consequences. We all felt those consequences during the financial collapse last year. Unintended consequences always result from top-down big government plans like the current health care proposals, and we can’t afford to ignore that fact again.


Supposedly the Senate Finance bill will be paid for by cutting Medicare by nearly half a trillion dollars and by taxing the so-called “Cadillac” health care plans enjoyed by many union members. The plan will also impose heavy taxes on insurers, pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, and clinical labs. [3] The result of all of these taxes is clear. As Douglas Holtz-Eakin noted in the Wall Street Journal, these new taxes “will be passed on to consumers by either directly raising insurance premiums, or by fueling higher health-care costs that inevitably lead to higher premiums.” [4] Unfortunately, it will lead to lower wages too, as employees will have to sacrifice a greater percentage of their paychecks to cover these higher premiums. [5] In other words, if the Democrats succeed in overhauling health care, we’ll all bear the costs. The Senate Finance bill is effectively a middle class tax increase, and as Holtz-Eakin points out, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation those making less than $200,000 will be hit hardest. [6]

With our country’s debt and deficits growing at an alarming rate, many of us can’t help but wonder how we can afford a new trillion dollar entitlement program. The president has promised that he won’t sign a health care bill if it “adds even one dime to our deficit over the next decade.” [7] But his administration also promised that his nearly trillion dollar stimulus plan would keep the unemployment rate below 8%. [8] Last month, our unemployment rate was 9.8%, the highest it’s been in 26 years. [9] At first the current administration promised that the stimulus would save or create 3 to 4 million jobs. [10] Then they declared that it created 1 million jobs, but the stimulus reports released this week showed that a mere 30,083 jobs have been created, while nearly 3.4 million jobs have been lost since the stimulus was passed. [11] Should we believe the administration’s claims about health care when their promises have proven so unreliable about the stimulus?


In January 2008, presidential candidate Obama promised not to negotiate behind closed doors with health care lobbyists. In fact, he committed to “broadcasting those negotiations on C-SPAN so that the American people can see what the choices are. Because part of what we have to do is enlist the American people in this process. And overcoming the special interests and the lobbyists...” [12] However, last February, after serving only a few weeks in office, President Obama met privately at the White House with health care industry executives and lobbyists. [13] Yesterday,
POLITICO reported that aides to President Obama and Democrat Senator Max Baucus met with corporate lobbyists in April to help “set in motion a multimillion-dollar advertising campaign, primarily financed by industry groups, that has played a key role in bolstering public support for health care reform.” [14] Needless to say, their negotiations were not broadcast on C-SPAN for the American people to see.

Presidential candidate Obama also promised that he would not “sign any nonemergency bill without giving the American public an opportunity to review and comment on the White House Web site for five days.” [15]
PolitiFact reports that this promise has already been broken three times by the current administration. [16] We can only hope that it won’t be broken again with health care reform.

All of this certainly gives the appearance of politics-as-usual in Washington with no change in sight.


Americans want health care reform because we want affordable health care. We don’t need subsidies or a public option. We don’t need a nationalized health care industry. We need to reduce health care costs. But the Senate Finance plan will dramatically increase those costs, all the while ignoring common sense cost-saving measures like tort reform. Though a Congressional Budget Office report confirmed that reforming medical malpractice and liability laws could save as much as $54 billion over the next ten years, tort reform is nowhere to be found in the Senate Finance bill. [17]


Here’s a novel idea. Instead of working contrary to the free market, let’s embrace the free market. Instead of going to war with certain private sector companies, let’s embrace real private-sector competition and allow consumers to purchase plans across state lines. Instead of taxing the so-called “Cadillac” plans that people get through their employers, let’s give individuals who purchase their own health care the same tax benefits we currently give employer-provided health care recipients. Instead of crippling Medicare, let’s reform it by providing recipients with vouchers so that they can purchase their own coverage.


Now is the time to make your voices heard before it’s too late. If we don’t fight for the market-oriented, patient-centered, and result-driven reform plan that we deserve, we’ll be left with the disastrous unintended consequences of the plans currently being cooked up in Washington.


- Sarah Palin


[1] See
http://tinyurl.com/yjs3mgf
[2] See
http://tinyurl.com/yfuw3k3
[3] See
http://tinyurl.com/yfxq8ca
[4] See
http://tinyurl.com/ykefsk6
[5] See
http://tinyurl.com/ygf42fj
[6] See
http://tinyurl.com/ykefsk6
[7] See http://tinyurl.com/lkvgsp
[8] See
http://tinyurl.com/nx4nh6
[9] See ibid.
[10] See
http://tinyurl.com/yhhr56v
[11] See ibid.

[12] See http://tinyurl.com/yhzhkvg and http://tinyurl.com/lhyr9o
[13] See
http://tinyurl.com/yksd6h3
[14] See
http://tinyurl.com/yl9gg27
[15] See
http://tinyurl.com/yknpxd6
[16] See
http://tinyurl.com/d2k5hb
[17] See
http://tinyurl.com/yf8qmfh


ACTION ITEMS
  1. Click here or here to support Michele Bachmann as she fights to save our freedoms.
  2. Click here or here to support Sarah Palin and like-minded patriots who are fighting to save our freedoms.
  3. Click here to CONTACT YOUR CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION. Congresswoman Bachmann says they do pay attention if they get thousands of calls a day.

Engage!

hrh

No comments: